38 See McClure, supra 3, 363 (reducing the relevance of contracts for a small set of non-controversial issues); see also Louis Henkin, Constitutionalism, Democracy, and Foreign Affairs 60 (1990) (finding that the executive agreement is the most democratic instrument); See also Ackerman – Golove, supra note 30, at 916 (concluding that the rise of the congressional executive agreement favors „[e]fficacy, democracy [and] legitimacy“). Hathaway completes his theory with an empirical evaluation of 3,119 agreements concluded between 1980 and 2000. It finds that the observed model of contract use is inconsistent with theories that attribute the treaty to a different quality from the executive agreement of Congress. Instead, Hathaway argues that the best way to explain the use of the contract instrument is a historical lens. Footnote 42 In your view, the prevalence of the agreement between Congress and the executive branch is the result of Congress` desire to remove barriers to trade after World War II, which required greater flexibility and authority for the president in negotiating trade agreements. Footnote 43 This has led to the conventional application of congressional executive agreements in commercial (and financial) affairs. In other areas such as human rights, the debate was highly politicized and Congress had no desire to give up the sovereignty of the nation, which is subject to the lower legal bar set by the agreement between Congress and the executive branch. In the case of executive agreements, it seems generally accepted that the president, if he has the independent power to enter into an executive agreement, can denounce the agreement independently, without the approval of Congress or the Senate. 186 Thus, observers seem to agree that if the Constitution authorizes the President to enter into exclusive executive agreements, the President may unilaterally denounce these agreements.187 The same principle would apply to political commitments: to the extent that the President is empowered to make non-binding commitments without the consent of the Senate or Congress, the President may also unilaterally withdraw from those commitments.188 , however, not to fetishize this dichotomy.